Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_15.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=GUGC FASTA(n).Sequence=GUGC
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:34
Evaluating how sequences fit models
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  68.94, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -6.70, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  40.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.98, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  58.25, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.42, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.99, deficit -0.14, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.37, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.07, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  91.90, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76094.1,  5 NTs,                 CAAUG,score      -4.26, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.39, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.80, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  92.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  86.11, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.80, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  92.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.82, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.51, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.65, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  50.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -3.29, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.80, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  92.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCUCA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.95, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  86.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AACUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76094.1,  5 NTs,                 CAAUG,score      -4.27, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  53.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.44, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
UCAAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.31, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.55, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  54.28, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.28, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -7.12, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  33.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -9.21, deficit  6.01, CutoffScore  36.72, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAUA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.37, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.72, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  36.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUCA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.52, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.33, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  66.03, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.86, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  60.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -5.81, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  78.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.82, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  58.72, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.65, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CCAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  63.37, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.77, deficit -0.15, CutoffScore  69.97, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
GCGAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -8.20, deficit  5.19, CutoffScore  45.37, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUCUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  61.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.03, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  88.51, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  67.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.99, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  47.52, ed  1, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
CUACUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.14, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  37.84, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUUGC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.87, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  60.58, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUAAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.28, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  66.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUUGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.52, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.79, deficit  6.85, CutoffScore  31.33, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.86, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  60.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.49, deficit  5.73, CutoffScore  40.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  55.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.35, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  73.03, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAUUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_29966.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.50, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.81, deficit  1.76, CutoffScore  81.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.52, deficit -0.40, CutoffScore  72.62, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
GUGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.47, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  30.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.13, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore  33.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAUUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -7.83, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  94.07, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.50, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  45.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUAGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -9.12, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  36.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCUAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  62.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  63.37, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGCCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.21, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  46.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.73, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  87.33, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.49, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  81.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUAAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.49, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  81.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAGUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.67, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  84.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.83, deficit  0.46, CutoffScore  32.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.88, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -8.29, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  44.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.35, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  73.03, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUUCGA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.62, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  35.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.70, deficit  3.77, CutoffScore  28.77, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUGUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.52, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.06, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAUAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.76, deficit  1.66, CutoffScore  82.55, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUUAAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.68, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  54.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.61, deficit  2.48, CutoffScore  73.92, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUCGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.89, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.63, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore  24.57, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.71, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  35.24, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
GAAGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.20, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  34.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUACGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.74, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  20.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.61, deficit  6.85, CutoffScore  28.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUCCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -6.96, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  37.31, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.41, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.54, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  60.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GUGGCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.23, deficit  3.77, CutoffScore  28.78, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  45.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
AUUACAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.86, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  30.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCCUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.28, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  42.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUCAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  25.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAUGACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.72, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  49.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.13, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.53, deficit  0.30, CutoffScore  65.31, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  19.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUAAGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.00, deficit  0.76, CutoffScore  61.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCACUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.85, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  34.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUAAAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.41, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGACUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.24, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  33.68, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
ACCUAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.97, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUAACG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.06, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  50.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAACGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.88, deficit  8.12, CutoffScore  15.36, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUAUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.91, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  32.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -7.72, deficit -0.34, CutoffScore  40.38, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCCCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.20, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.19, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCGAAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.98, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  40.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
ACUGAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -5.56, deficit -0.04, CutoffScore  73.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGUAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.72, deficit  1.16, CutoffScore  56.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
CGGUUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.01, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  66.15, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  46.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAUGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.95, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  52.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAUGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.95, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  52.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUCAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.23, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  48.03, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.95, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  54.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
AGAAGGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -12.28, deficit  7.26, CutoffScore  24.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CCCGGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.79, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  28.96, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
AGUGAUAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -7.28, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  58.01, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.92, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCGACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.27, deficit -0.13, CutoffScore  69.77, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.12, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -5.90, deficit  1.14, CutoffScore  66.94, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UGAAAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.07, deficit  4.07, CutoffScore  25.60, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUACGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  28.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUAAAGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.09, deficit  1.70, CutoffScore  50.52, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAGCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.70, deficit  2.97, CutoffScore  13.42, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -8.91, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  36.81, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUCGAUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.15, deficit -0.25, CutoffScore  71.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAGUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.33, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  33.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.87, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  59.02, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUAAUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -7.04, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  60.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CCAGAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.25, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  40.32, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
UUAAGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.46, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore  26.19, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AACCCCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.29, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  69.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UUACGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -13.16, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore   9.98, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
UACAGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.50, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  14.60, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAGGUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.11, deficit  1.63, CutoffScore  33.68, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGGAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.54, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  66.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUGAAAUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -5.19, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  72.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGGAGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.66, deficit  4.92, CutoffScore  39.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -6.72, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  68.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGGAAGUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.89, deficit  5.87, CutoffScore  32.35, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GGCGCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.71, deficit  2.24, CutoffScore  28.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAGUGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.20, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  27.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGGCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -8.80, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  21.72, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAUCGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -6.36, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  46.93, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GAGAGCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -10.36, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  34.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAGCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.13, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  56.68, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAAAAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -9.06, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  51.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -9.76, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  25.29, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCCGAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.35, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  14.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GAAACCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.69, deficit  2.96, CutoffScore  52.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCGUUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.22, deficit  2.97, CutoffScore  26.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
UGAGUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -11.00, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  18.54, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CAAGAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -11.73, deficit  7.10, CutoffScore  37.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GGUAAACC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -7.74, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  42.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -10.94, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  15.22, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGGGGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.00, deficit  2.98, CutoffScore  17.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GAUGACGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.19, CutoffScore  34.40, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAUAUUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.68, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  60.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  61.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCUCGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score      -9.70, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  59.37, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
AGGGAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.93, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  54.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUGUCGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.56, deficit  5.80, CutoffScore  26.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAACAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.83, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  40.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCGCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -13.94, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  16.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGAUCUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -14.40, deficit  8.22, CutoffScore   8.27, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
AGAAUAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.01, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  30.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUGGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -9.49, deficit  0.78, CutoffScore  15.73, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.79, deficit  4.97, CutoffScore  11.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UUUACGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.41, deficit  3.84, CutoffScore  26.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAACGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -10.95, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  15.75, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAUAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.95, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  13.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCCAAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.48, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  18.17, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CAAAGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.21, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  52.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
AUCAAAAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -6.00, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  35.43, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
AGCGAGUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.61, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore   3.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCCCGAAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score     -10.20, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  41.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
AUCAUAAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -13.89, deficit  9.26, CutoffScore  23.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -6.05, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  55.45, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.29, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  42.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAACUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -11.36, deficit  6.06, CutoffScore  13.90, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGCGAAGAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.57, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  37.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCACAACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.52, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore  32.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
ACUUUGACU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.40, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  83.69, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACGAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -10.21, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  21.95, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUAGGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.06, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  24.87, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GUACUAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.44, deficit  5.87, CutoffScore  33.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CGUGAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -8.33, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  59.55, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCCUUAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score      -6.70, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  48.56, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAGGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -12.25, deficit  4.02, CutoffScore  26.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCGCGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.46, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  44.55, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
AUUACCAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.06, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  75.65, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW                                 
UUUAUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -10.79, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  23.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CCCCACUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.75, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  24.24, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -7.89, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  41.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUAAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score      -8.62, deficit  6.26, CutoffScore  39.71, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUUUCGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.66, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  50.51, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCUGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -12.53, deficit  6.81, CutoffScore  34.62, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CCCGGUACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.49, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  42.93, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CAGUUCUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -8.33, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  57.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CUCUUUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.01, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  40.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCAAAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -7.92, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  23.49, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
AUUACGGUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.44, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  18.46, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CAUUCUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -10.77, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  19.32, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGAAUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.58, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  40.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAGAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGACGCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUAGAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -9.30, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  24.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
UCAUCAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.81, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  15.55, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUACAUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.53, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  25.53, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
AGAAGAGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.97, deficit  7.67, CutoffScore   6.68, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCAUACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.96, deficit  6.33, CutoffScore  23.23, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GAUACUACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCCGCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.94, deficit  4.37, CutoffScore  25.05, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CACGAACGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.79, deficit  4.36, CutoffScore  19.17, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
UUCUCAAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.21, deficit  6.13, CutoffScore  31.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACCGGUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.99, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  29.71, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCUCGACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.18, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  14.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAUAAAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  0.84, CutoffScore  30.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CAUUGGAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -8.60, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  57.95, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAGCGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  49.28, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUGCUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.45, deficit  5.31, CutoffScore  27.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GAACUGCCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.99, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  26.69, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGGACACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -12.42, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore   6.59, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAAGUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.14, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  34.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUUAAAGAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.56, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore  29.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGUUCUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.32, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GUCUCACCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.04, deficit  6.70, CutoffScore  20.26, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUUACUGCAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -14.22, deficit  6.84, CutoffScore  16.59, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUUAGACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -9.93, deficit  1.62, CutoffScore  49.09, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUCGUAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -13.53, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  37.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGUACAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.48, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  49.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAUUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.43, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  40.18, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGGUGGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.42, deficit  5.79, CutoffScore  25.81, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCGUAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.74, deficit 10.11, CutoffScore   4.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUGACGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.54, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore   1.88, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUCGAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.21, deficit  4.13, CutoffScore  20.32, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGAAAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.39, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  11.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
UUCUUAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.03, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  25.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCCUCAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.96, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  24.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GGGUAAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -11.96, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore  20.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AUCUUGAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.85, deficit  7.86, CutoffScore   6.38, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGUGAAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -6.44, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  55.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GAUAUCGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -11.41, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore   3.05, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAAGAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  49.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUCGAAGCCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.06, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore  20.15, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUGAAUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.03, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore  14.28, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
AUGGUUAUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.35, deficit  4.07, CutoffScore  43.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UAUUAAAAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -11.26, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  36.02, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
ACGGGCAAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score      -9.85, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  52.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUAAACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -8.16, deficit -0.16, CutoffScore  20.83, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGUAAUUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -11.26, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  12.98, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCCGUGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.64, deficit  6.07, CutoffScore  32.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
UUCGAUAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.78, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore   4.74, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CACUAAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.18, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  14.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCUUGGCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -13.96, deficit  8.39, CutoffScore  19.35, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GAAAAUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.04, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  21.27, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CCUUUUGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.78, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore   9.17, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAGAAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.83, deficit  7.01, CutoffScore  28.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAUAAAUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.75, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  48.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGAUGCUUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -11.88, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  10.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAUAACAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -8.95, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  33.02, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUUGAAAAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.20, deficit  7.12, CutoffScore  18.48, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUGGAAAAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.36, deficit  6.48, CutoffScore  26.64, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGCUCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -13.23, deficit  4.35, CutoffScore  25.83, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCAAAUGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -14.77, deficit  5.43, CutoffScore  14.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCAUGCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.87, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  28.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCGUAGCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.00, deficit  5.88, CutoffScore   8.65, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAACCAUUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -17.34, deficit  8.33, CutoffScore   4.29, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUUGAAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.38, deficit  3.77, CutoffScore  19.93, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAAGCGUGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -10.52, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  24.20, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGGAACUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -15.50, deficit 10.16, CutoffScore   2.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AACGUUUAGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.36, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  25.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUCUAUGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -12.84, deficit  4.76, CutoffScore   7.38, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAACUAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.10, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  22.17, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGUCAAGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -10.88, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore   8.14, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AUGGAUCCCGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.22, deficit  7.40, CutoffScore  33.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAGGUUAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -15.97, deficit  7.89, CutoffScore   6.66, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGGCUAUUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.82, deficit  5.09, CutoffScore  27.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGCAGUGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.77, deficit  3.53, CutoffScore   6.93, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAUAAGUAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.71, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  23.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCCAAAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.90, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  10.40, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCCGGAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -11.38, deficit  4.34, CutoffScore  22.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
UUCGGGGGUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.03, deficit  7.15, CutoffScore   5.05, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GGUCAAUGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -18.38, deficit  9.09, CutoffScore   8.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
AUUUCAUAGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score      -9.62, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  33.03, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAACCGAACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.97, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  27.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAACCCAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -12.82, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  29.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCGGGAUAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -13.18, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore  17.59, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGGUGUUCCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.78, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  25.93, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAAUGGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -13.00, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore   5.52, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUGCGCGAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.27, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  20.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUGAAUGAUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.71, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  38.55, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCUCAACAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.96, deficit  2.67, CutoffScore  29.44, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
ACUGUUUAGCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -14.89, deficit  5.45, CutoffScore  12.48, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CUCCCAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -11.03, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  24.97, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
GGAUCUGUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score      -9.70, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  39.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUGUUCAACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -12.78, deficit  6.60, CutoffScore  16.89, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GGUACAAAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.22, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  12.28, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GAGACUAACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.96, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore   8.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
AAUUAAAUAAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.09, deficit  7.69, CutoffScore  13.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUAUCGCGAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -15.51, deficit  6.98, CutoffScore   2.94, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUAAAAUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.70, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  10.91, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AUAGAUCGGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.23, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore   4.17, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAUUGUGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.85, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  28.20, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUCAACGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -17.39, deficit  8.10, CutoffScore  14.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CGGAGAAAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.67, deficit  3.55, CutoffScore   6.92, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCCAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.19, deficit  7.12, CutoffScore   1.39, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGUAGGAAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.24, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  19.16, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.93, deficit  6.15, CutoffScore   9.24, ed  5, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GUAGUAUCACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.72, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore   8.14, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAGCUGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -17.06, deficit 10.33, CutoffScore   3.33, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGAAGAAGAUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.29, deficit  4.18, CutoffScore   3.16, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUUUGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.88, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  26.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AUAAAGGAGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.02, deficit  7.95, CutoffScore  12.60, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUCCGAAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -12.43, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  23.23, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUAUUAGUUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.30, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore  20.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUUCGCAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -17.13, deficit 10.48, CutoffScore   2.30, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CGAGAACUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.48, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  14.00, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUCUUGGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.92, deficit  7.93, CutoffScore   5.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCGAAGGCAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.96, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  14.67, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGAUUAUGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.66, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  16.95, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGGGGGGAUGUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.33, deficit  4.55, CutoffScore  13.46, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUAUCGAAACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -12.51, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  26.98, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CGCAGAUGAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -13.83, deficit  7.36, CutoffScore   0.78, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CUUUACAAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.90, deficit  6.64, CutoffScore   1.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AGAAAAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.79, deficit  6.93, CutoffScore   2.60, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUUAAAGAAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31581.6, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.62, deficit  6.47, CutoffScore   7.64, ed  5, 4 cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F                 
GUGAAGGGUUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29958.1, 10 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -14.42, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore   2.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAAUUCGAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.10, deficit  1.87, CutoffScore   7.38, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGGUGUUGUGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29958.1, 10 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -14.42, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore   2.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUAAAGAAAAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.84, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore   2.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAUUUGGGCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.98, deficit  2.75, CutoffScore   1.49, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUAUGAGAUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -18.03, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore   8.69, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAGAAAGAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.84, deficit  7.77, CutoffScore  13.53, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UUGGACCCUAUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -16.85, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore   5.81, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUCUUAAACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.40, deficit  9.11, CutoffScore   2.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGGUUAAAAGCAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.80, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  15.14, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CCAAUCCUCCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -15.98, deficit  5.73, CutoffScore   9.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CGAUAACGAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.85, deficit  9.12, CutoffScore   9.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UAUGAAGAUUUCUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -17.36, deficit  6.59, CutoffScore   2.80, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAUCCAGUCAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02581.1, 11 NTs,       CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG,score     -16.99, deficit  7.46, CutoffScore   2.94, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F                   
UCAAAAAAUAGAAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -17.00, deficit  6.78, CutoffScore   3.48, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 88.0000	  6.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 84.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 44.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 36.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 84.0000	 74.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 94.0000	 58.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 90.0000	 48.0000
[7 7]	 98.0000	 54.0000	 14.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 38.0000	  0.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 14.0000	  2.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  51 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  95 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 132 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 141 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 267 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 290 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 348 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 348 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 349 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 362 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 383 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 392 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 398 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 424 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 439 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 444 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 455 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 467 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 520 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 531 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 539 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 542 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 563 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 598 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 630 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 661 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 699 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 724 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 747 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 763 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 795 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 872 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 874 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 913 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 921 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 952 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 1046 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 1095 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 1107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 1144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1482 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1492 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1608 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1626 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1768 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1797 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 2.1949%
Number of models giving false positives is 238 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.50
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     0.97
